Comments on: Why We Write http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/ A lawyer seeking change on the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Write me at Bo.Rumpole@Gmail.com Fri, 29 May 2009 13:04:44 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: $columns[1] http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/#comment-125 $columns[1] Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:27:59 +0000 http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-125 $columns[4] $columns[4]

]]> By: My Opinion http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/#comment-61 My Opinion Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:42:35 +0000 http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-61 We love justice We love justice

]]> By: My Opinion http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/#comment-59 My Opinion Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:34:14 +0000 http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-59 I love the Supreme Court and think that all of our wonderful justices and all the Circuit Judges do a great job. Why all the negative comments? Rodney King said it best, "Can't we all just get along." I love the Supreme Court and think that all of our wonderful justices and all the Circuit Judges do a great job. Why all the negative comments? Rodney King said it best, “Can’t we all just get along.”

]]> By: WV Lawyer http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/#comment-58 WV Lawyer Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:29:18 +0000 http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-58 I really have to ask "who cares." And does the f'ing state bar really think that when we fill out those stupid forms related to qualifications for someone to be a judge or, GOD forbid, a S. Ct. justice, that we even for a minute believe that they do not somehow find their way to the evaluated person and most likely with my name (or yours) on it. It is a complete farce -- not just the evaluations -- the whole state bar process -- when a group of folks can conspire to hide embezzlement and not be at the very least suspended for some period of time is absurd. Some poor sap with an office in the Union Bldg., a part-time sec. and his phone and fax hooked to the same line farts during a deposition and Crackson Holier than Thou has has a cow and fires off a letter re: your profesionalism. Give me a break! Go BO! I really have to ask “who cares.” And does the f’ing state bar really think that when we fill out those stupid forms related to qualifications for someone to be a judge or, GOD forbid, a S. Ct. justice, that we even for a minute believe that they do not somehow find their way to the evaluated person and most likely with my name (or yours) on it. It is a complete farce — not just the evaluations — the whole state bar process — when a group of folks can conspire to hide embezzlement and not be at the very least suspended for some period of time is absurd. Some poor sap with an office in the Union Bldg., a part-time sec. and his phone and fax hooked to the same line farts during a deposition and Crackson Holier than Thou has has a cow and fires off a letter re: your profesionalism. Give me a break! Go BO!

]]> By: Trodd http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/why-we-write/#comment-20 Trodd Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:49:33 +0000 http://boknowslaw.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-20 But how do you know so much about the internal workings of the court? Anyone who reads the newspapers could make comments on a State Supreme Court election, but I don't ever remember seeing the pro-Canterbury letter mentioned in the press. Obviously, you either work for Starcher or are BFFs with someone who does. No one seemed to give a shit about the "reputation" of the court for the last decade when Starcher and McGraw were making a mockery of justice here in West Virgnia. Now because of some photographs, it has been made the top priority of the state. How could anyone possibly have viewed McGraw's "Rant at Racine" and then said that he was a fair and unbiased Judge on the court? Your blog is nothing but more than a place where you can say the things that Larry Messina does not have the balls to on his own blog. But how do you know so much about the internal workings of the court?

Anyone who reads the newspapers could make comments on a State Supreme Court election, but I don’t ever remember seeing the pro-Canterbury letter mentioned in the press.

Obviously, you either work for Starcher or are BFFs with someone who does.

No one seemed to give a shit about the “reputation” of the court for the last decade when Starcher and McGraw were making a mockery of justice here in West Virgnia. Now because of some photographs, it has been made the top priority of the state.

How could anyone possibly have viewed McGraw’s “Rant at Racine” and then said that he was a fair and unbiased Judge on the court?

Your blog is nothing but more than a place where you can say the things that Larry Messina does not have the balls to on his own blog.

]]>